With Snapcash, users simply type out the dollar amount they’d like to send as part of any private message — for example, “here’s $5 for lunch.” The app recognizes the “$5” text and a green payments button illuminates next to the keyboard. Users can then tap that button to activate the payment, which is completed once the message has been sent.
This year’s theme was “Rise of the Machines”. The general theme for the day was the intersection between marketing and technology. From connected devices, to marketing automation to data informed execution.
I don’t think I took a single note during the keynotes from Jaron Lanier, Dean Kamen and Amy Webb. I threw a few tweets out, but really was just trying to keep up with minds far more active than mine.
Don't address the fear of smart machines. Address stupid people. #mimasummit
I’ve been using the term Big Data wrong – Big Data isn’t a really large database, or using your existing CRM data smartly… that’s just lots of Data. Big Data is any dataset that couldn’t be included on a single Spreadsheet, or managed on a single computer – Prof. Jason Baldridge and Ken Cho
90% of the data in the world has been created in the last 2 years. 90% of that was from social.
I really need to read up on algorithms… or take a class
Regarding technology adoption:
Garrick van Buren reminded me that you CAN be an “expert in digital products”, yet prevent them from controlling your life.
He provided a few simple questions to help assess technology adoption. These are good for personal or corporate decision making:
Does it save me labor?
Does it bring me closer to those who are important to me?
Can I control it?
Can this be the last time I make this decision?
Is maintenance and waste inconsequential?
Are skills and abilities reusable and transferable?
Does my technology save labor? Or just give me more places to work? #mimasummit
Lisa Maria Martin keyed on on content process. She pointed out that we’re always interested in the processes of other creative minds and organizations, because we want to be able to replicate that creative process and outcome. However, process is never clean.
Lisa suggest we start by mapping out our reality. Audit our process:
What roles are involved?
What tasks are our individuals doing?
Who specifically is filling those roles?
What tools are we using?
Once you’ve audited your content process, write it… or draw it… or document it in someway with your team.
Start with what you’re actually doing, and adjust it from that point.
Our content workflow will add value to our content strategy.
The UN may be poised to take over Internet regulation.
Much of the success of the Internet can be attributed to it’s open nature. No single government controls it. Since it’s inception, the Internet has been self regulated, with some of the earliest engineers still involved in setting standards.
At it’s purest, it can cross geographic and idealogical boundaries. That can cause a problem if you run a nation that tries to set some pretty strict idealogical boundaries (or even tax boundaries).
A number of UN nations would love to see that change.
From the Wall Street Journal:
For more than a year, these countries have lobbied an agency called the International Telecommunications Union to take over the rules and workings of the Internet. Created in 1865 as the International Telegraph Union, the ITU last drafted a treaty on communications in 1988, before the commercial Internet, when telecommunications meant voice telephone calls via national telephone monopolies.
Having the Internet rewired by bureaucrats would be like handing a Stradivarius to a gorilla.
You can’t patent an abstract idea… but can you patent the processing of that idea through a computer?
In a 9-0 ruling today, the Supreme Court says “not entirely” (here in PDF form)
In the case “Alice Corporation vs CLS Bank”, Alice Corporation maintains a series of patents on processes used to mitigate the risk of a settlement in a transaction. Essentially (if I’m reading this right) a process for making sure both parties in a transaction meet their obligation.
The court determined that the concepts behind the process were not patent eligible (affirming lower court rulings along the same lines), and that simply processing them through a computer did not add to that eligibility.
From the court decision:
We hold that the claims at issue are drawn to the abstract idea of intermediated settlement, and that merely requiring generic computer implementation fails to transform that abstract idea into a patent-eligible invention.
What this means:
This seems to open the floodgate to challenges on hundreds of thousands of software patents, according to some.
UPDATE: Wow… this is a frustratingly addicting app. It isn’t that I have to reply with an image… I have to provide an image, to view the “locked” image that was sent to me.
That just opens up an endless loop of image sharing!
The app also allows me to “Reply” to an image in an unlocked format. I’ve had a little fun with the form-function on that feature…
(ORIGINAL POST)
Facebook is set to roll out a new “disposable message” app “Slingshot” today.
Similar to other apps like Snapchat, and the recently shuttered Facebook Poke, Slingshot allows the user to share a photo or video moment with a friend, or a group.
The next step, however, is where the app differentiates itself a little. In order to reply, you also have to include an image or short video. If you want to participate, you have to do more than just comment.
With Slingshot, we saw an opportunity to create something new and different: a space where you can share everyday moments with lots of people at once.
In response to a cease and desist from Verizon, David Hyman (general counsel at Netflix) offered a letter in response.
Along with a description of Netflix “ongoing transparency efforts”, Hyman offers this picture:
To try to shift blame to us for performance issues arising from interconnection congestion is like blaming drivers on a bridge for traffic jams when you’re the one who decided to leave three lanes closed during rush hour.
Social Networking is moving from “Broadcast” to “Private Share”
As individuals, we are migrating from sharing with our entire ecosystem of contacts (The Facebook status update?), and more with a smaller group of friends (Snapchat, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp).
Or rather:… Increasingly, our social interactions happen with smaller groups.
Implications:
While this may not be the time to start a Snapchat account for your brand… we need to realize the changing expectation in user experience.
The user will increasingly be expecting targeted, personal messaging on all of our channels.
How can targeted messages help us cultivate our most valuable relationships?
Like so many others (much smarter than I) I started putting together a post with my key observations and takeaways, but it started to get pretty long. So, I did thought what any good blogger would think… “Hey… a series!”
So, over the next week or two, I’m planning to trickle out some fairly digestible takeaways, observations and implications.
Today… it’s all mobile.
Mobile continues to grow… a lot.
I think we’ve been here before… but the numbers continue to astound.
Tablet usage is up 52% in the last year, and mobile now makes up 25% of Internet traffic (up from 14% last year).
What this means…
This means we need continue to assess our experiences in the mobile space. I need to keep an eye on my entire engagement platform
Some key communication mechanisms like email and social could even be considered “Mobile First” (They should look good on mobile, even if it’s at the expense of Desktop).
With every digital initiative, we should be asking “how will this experience be on a phone or tablet?”
As this position becomes uniform across the industry, U.S. tech companies will ignore the instructions stamped on the fronts of subpoenas urging them not to alert subjects about data requests, industry lawyers say. Companies that already routinely notify users have found that investigators often drop data demands to avoid having suspects learn of inquiries.